HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread

(Yesterday 16:23 )Tumble_Drier Wrote:  Legends? Nah. Any committee will be inevitably accused of trying to push their favourites onto the Members. It'll be a thankless task and people will pack it in after the first year because of all the grief they get.

I suspect, that because of this point snooks might be wise and avoid this avenue. I still think it could work if a shortlist is submitted for all members to vote on, but people moaned when we had a one-off go at this last time. Whilst I think I have the experience & some knowledge to put forward some worthy candidates, if ever asked I'd avoid getting involved despite wanting to help, I don't need the hassle. n

Historically HOF's are steeped in controversy. There's clearly been some corruption & a Witch Hunt against Belichick in the American Football HOF this year. They seemed to have made an issue over his Spygate controversy, which has absolutely nothing to do which his career achievements.
By the same token Lori Buckby could miss out due to her criminal past.

(Yesterday 18:10 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  By the same token Lori Buckby could miss out due to her criminal past.

*Makes zip across mouth gesture*

I'm confident anyone voting for Lori Buckby will not be evaluating the moral dimension, any more than they do for anybody else.

Why is there a Hall of Fame at all? You want to "show respect" for babes of yore. Either vote them all in, in whatever increments you wish, or just chuck them all in, even the shit ones (see above).

I don't think it needs to be restricted to babes who've got on with their lives and do other things; plenty of musicians have been inducted in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame and keep on rocking.

I think we're making this way to complicated

How about this, nominate 8 babes, get them to compete in the Hunger Games, and the one that comes out alive is inducted

(27-01-2026 10:04 )Snooks Wrote:  The mood music seems to be for a higher number of Inductees per year. Are we generally in favour of this? If not please say so.

I'm happy with the current 1 day babe (or tits out behind paywall) & 1 night babe (or tits out on FTA) format.

I like that the HOF is prestigious like the UKAP Awards.

(27-01-2026 10:04 )Snooks Wrote:  The other significant issue is around what categories are implemented in the event of a clear desire for a higher number of Inductees. The concept of 'Eras' seems to be the prevailing one. Are we in favour of this? How do we want it to work? Do we want clear start and end points of each era?

If eras are introduced to increase inductees, then maybe it could be broken down into 5 year periods, based on when a babe debuted. For example...

2002-2006 debutant day & night inductees
2007-2011 debutant day & night inductees
2012-2016 debutant day & night inductees

(27-01-2026 10:04 )Snooks Wrote:  Do we approve of the Goodfella idea of a bespoke “legends” category only open for anyone who debuted before a certain year with the other category being for those that made their debut after that year? Or do we want something else?

A separate legends category might not be needed, if day & night babes that debuted 10 years ago are the only eligible inductees and the eras format is used.

(27-01-2026 10:04 )Snooks Wrote:  If you want eras in any form would you like me to do some forum research to give you a guide as to which babes fall into certain categories? If so please say so. I would be happy to do this with advanced warning and dedicate my time to it to make life easier for you, the voters.

That's a good idea. I think the A-Z thread on here might have the details of every babe that's ever appeared on a channel since 2002, and the year of their debut.

(27-01-2026 10:04 )Snooks Wrote:  These are just a couple of areas for debate I have identified. There are obviously more besides. I am open to lots of ideas so don't be shy and let me know your thoughts. I'm sure there will be much food for thought as the ideas and opinions roll in. So please bid me Bon Appetit as I digest it all and hopefully come up with a format that is as acceptable to as many as possible .

The format of the nomination and voting process could be kept simple.

There could possibly be a Campaign Stage for any members to promote any babes from 2002 onwards, that they think are worthy of being nominated and that may have been forgotten about, with links to their A-Z thread.

Or start with a Nomination Stage for everyone to officially put forward the singular or multiple day & night babes that debuted a decade prior, that they deem HOF worthy.

And finally either the day & night babe with the most nominations gets inducted into the HOF, or the top 3 day & night babes with the most nominations go to a Final Stage and the winners get inducted.

Thanks for doing this, I'm sure you'll be amazing at running the HOF.

(Today 04:10 )ryuken Wrote:  I think the A-Z thread on here might have the details of every babe that's ever appeared on a channel since 2002, and the year of their debut.

Finding the details of the babes who finished on the shows before the start of the forum has been difficult and there are the majority of the babes who aren't there.

For example I had to quickly put together a post for Lolly Badcock in November and she was still on the shows up to 2014.