HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread

I'd support some sort of measure to allow at least one of the two inductees to be a former performer - left 5 or 10 years ago, started at least 10 years ago, etc.

(08-12-2025 18:19 )Supersteve247 Wrote:  

(08-12-2025 17:52 )TDK2008 Wrote:  Surprised to see Michelle Moist and Ella Jolie aren't in the HOF for Nights. Surprised to see Gemma Hiles isn't in the HOF for Days.

Gemma Hiles! Forgot about her.

I nearly did when I cast my ballot.

(08-12-2025 18:21 )verybadroger Wrote:  

(08-12-2025 17:52 )TDK2008 Wrote:  Surprised to see Michelle Moist and Ella Jolie aren't in the HOF for Nights. Surprised to see Gemma Hiles isn't in the HOF for Days.

Ella and Michelle are future inductees, I hope. Both long-appearing legends.

I hope so. Both should already be in imo. It's going to take some time with only one a year for the nights and one a year for the days.

(08-12-2025 17:14 )lovebabes56 Wrote:  

(08-12-2025 10:33 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  ^^ Stick that wasn't deserved. Just trying to do the right thing and make a change for the better.
It is about getting a balance between fun & accuracy. Sure knockouts are exciting & you can just about, (but not always) get away with a decent outcome in an annual award.
In a HOF it should be reflecting longevity & consistency over a period of years, the current format isn't really the best fit.

It should be a case of "Gone but not forgotten" As it stands it's a case of "Gone & never even heard of her"
As every year passes the chances of the veteran babes diminishes.
I have seriously thought about boycotting the HOF due to aspects that I find unfair, but would no doubt be viewed as childish.

If my earlier post disappointed you in any way Boomer, I apologise. and I apologise to any one else who saw my post and wasn't happy with it.

Not at mate, we all see things differently. Sorry to anyone who things I'm posting in an overly aggressive manner. I just have strong feelings regarding fair play.
There's no perfect answer & we can all start to feel a little disappointed when our favourites don't get inducted when we are convinced they deserve it.
I can't help it when I know I'm right about something like this.

If I remember correctly we have made changes o the HoF over the years its been running & I see no problem in us continuing to do so. I'd suggest that as this years vote is underway we let it run and then in January run a members consultation to discuss if changes should be made to next years vote. I have a lot of sympathy to the points being made about girls who appeared in the early years of the shows. In my view we could have more than one route into the HoF and the number inducted is also one we can amend if we see fit.

Once this year's competition is over we probably will look at ways to have more babes from the past inducted

One per month!

Ten per month!

GET ON WITH IT!

Y'know, just to balance out the inevitable "let's not rock the boat" brigade

(08-12-2025 17:52 )TDK2008 Wrote:  Surprised to see Michelle Moist and Ella Jolie aren't in the HOF for Nights. Surprised to see Gemma Hiles isn't in the HOF for Days.

Surprised Alice Goodwin isn't in the HOF for Nights either.

I would think that the discussion of who is and should be in the hall of fame, and who perhaps surprisingly isn't, could last a lifetime.

Well, 10 years so far - that's pretty close.

I do think there needs to be a way of getting girls who were very important in the history of the shows into the hof as unlikely to win a vote as limited members who remember them,
If you look at the needle movers some of the girls who were the most popular highest earner in babeshow history then that have not been on TV for 10-15 years,
It would be good if we could get more of a history of the shows recorded

Just want to say a big "thank you" for all your nominations so far guys - quite an impressive mix in both categories
Don't forget nominations close Sunday.