UK Babe Channels Babe Of The Year 2019

(23-08-2019 07:30 )babelover48 Wrote:  more than likely many voted with choosing their favourite babes and not basing their choices on the quality of their performances on screen

But why wouldn't you vote for your favourites?

More to the point, if someone wasn't a favourite of yours, you wouldn't be watching her anyway, so how would you know what her quality of performance was?

(25-08-2019 01:07 )eskimo quinn Wrote:  More to the point, if someone wasn't a favourite of yours, you wouldn't be watching her anyway, so how would you know what her quality of performance was?

This is not necessarily true of all folk.
I have seen performances down the years from babes I would not have previously deemed as favourites that turned me into a fan.
Although I have favourites the ebb and flow of nightshow performances means that favourites can have off nights while others can do well.
It is an advantage to watch the shows with an open mind.
Attitude and performance counts for a lot imo.
For example Atlanta Moreno has converted me into a fan.
I did not necessarily have her as a favourite but she has become one through the quality of her shows.

(21-08-2019 19:01 )babelover48 Wrote:  No Mikaela Witt & No Evelyn - have you guys got no taste anymore?

Perhaps you are the best person to answer this question, babelover48, as you didn't vote for Evelyn either.

I also noticed this post from goatman222.



As we can see it's been thanked by 5 people - who presumably agree with the sentiment expressed - but none of them voted for Evelyn.

If we are all being honest about this there are only like 3 night girls who should win in terms of quality and that would be atlanta, rebecca kelly, and lola knight.

As much as i love evelyn i think going to webshow only has ruined any chance she had of winning even i hardly see her these days i used to record her on sky but no more

(25-08-2019 12:48 )admin Wrote:  

(21-08-2019 19:01 )babelover48 Wrote:  No Mikaela Witt & No Evelyn - have you guys got no taste anymore?

Perhaps you are the best person to answer this question, babelover48, as you didn't vote for Evelyn either.

I also noticed this post from goatman222.



As we can see it's been thanked by 5 people - who presumably agree with the sentiment expressed - but none of them voted for Evelyn.

so much for a secret vote then

i am more than happy for everyone to know i didnt do a day girl vote,

i am also more than happy for everyone to know that i agree with goatman222 that Evelyn has a great ass,

i guess this means that next years vote will be public then as i always said it should be,

^ The vote is still secret as Admin has only pointed out who a few forum members did not vote for. Who they did vote for remains a mystery

^ Hmmm. Have to remember that trick next time I feel burdened by insider knowledge from pm's. Just point things out that were NOT said. (I'm joking btw.) Slippery slope IMO.

Plus aren't Mods always saying posters shouldn't read stuff into mere thanks. "Guys thank for all kinds of reasons" they say. And yet here is admin making that very kind of assumption about punters. We are all prone to it.

^ Although we should perhaps raise an eyebrow that Winsaw yet again takes the slightest opportunity to criticise this award when he supports an alternative award where the girls actually nominate themselves.

I view these awards as a bit of harmless fun. The Oscars they are not.

^^ just how did i have a go at the awards bit like me saying you always take the slightest opportunity to criticise me

there is no way admin can know why i thanked that post so why bring it up,

by pointing out who has not been voted for he is giving an idea of who people did vote for which is wrong if its meant to be a secret with no clues at all,