Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Jamie was on yesterday, but started an hour later than scheduled... She's been doing a couple of hours (cam from home) on her usual Mondays and Wednesdays, instead of full shifts.

The abusive attitude of some planks have made her cut back on her hours...

I have seen Jamie Jones on mfc.
I wouldn't be surprised if studio 66 loses another top asset shortly, I wonder if Serenity will be next either to another channel or the mfc route. Talking of doing from home shows so will not put up with studio 66 restricting the streams.
It would be a shame to lose her but if this channel doesn't I'll it's finger out that will happen.

.i see Kerrie Lee talking of another Lazarus comeback,have to agree she was good but now become very unreliable .
I wish this lot would stop looking back, bringing back old chestnuts and give younger models a decent chance.

(01-07-2021 11:24 )baywatcher Wrote:  I wish this lot would stop looking back, bringing back old chestnuts and give younger models a decent chance.

I can't understand what you're on about there. S66 is awash with new girls and has been for a couple of years. They seem to have a never ending supply if them. Almost every week they seem to introduce a new name. They don't look back or put any emphasis on bringing back older girls at all. Most of their recruitment is of newcomers to the channels. Look at their roster now and count how many girls would qualify as old chestnuts. Hardly any of them.

(01-07-2021 12:49 )davy crockett Wrote:  

(01-07-2021 11:24 )baywatcher Wrote:  I wish this lot would stop looking back, bringing back old chestnuts and give younger models a decent chance.

I can't understand what you're on about there. S66 is awash with new girls and has been for a couple of years. They seem to have a never ending supply if them. Almost every week they seem to introduce a new name. They don't look back or put any emphasis on bringing back older girls at all. Most of their recruitment is of newcomers to the channels. Look at their roster now and count how many girls would qualify as old chestnuts. Hardly any of them.

In fairness, I think baywatcher is agreeing with you; in terms of the profile of the channel with Arura, Ivy, Ruby Mae and others this year, it would seem S66 are also agreeing with you! (and me)

^^ same old problem though that 66 has had for years sign new talent and then never do anything to promote them and get them over with the fans,
they have a lot of younger new girls but how many ever get regular shifts and tv shows, at bs new girls can do 3 shows a week every week and that gets people used to them you start looking at what they are doing each show and soon you find you are following one of these new girls , at 66 it can be many days between studio shows and then only a few shows a month so its like the girl is starting new each time,

(01-07-2021 11:24 )baywatcher Wrote:  either to another channel or the mfc route

There's no such thing as the mfc route. Virtually all the girls who work on the channels also do their own camshows. Being on mfc or on adultwork or onlyfans or wherever doesn't stop anyone from working on the channels. Jamie Jones has been on mfc for a long time. It doesn't affect her S66 shifts.

(01-07-2021 11:24 )baywatcher Wrote:  I have seen Jamie Jones on mfc.
I wouldn't be surprised if studio 66 loses another top asset shortly, I wonder if Serenity will be next either to another channel or the mfc route. Talking of doing from home shows so will not put up with studio 66 restricting the streams.
It would be a shame to lose her but if this channel doesn't I'll it's finger out that will happen.

.i see Kerrie Lee talking of another Lazarus comeback,have to agree she was good but now become very unreliable .
I wish this lot would stop looking back, bringing back old chestnuts and give younger models a decent chance.

Wasn't there two Kerries before I'm sure she was on back in 2019 apparently she keeps arguing with the producers?

The S66 telephone call-in set-up is beyond a joke. The lead-in messaging is so unnecessarily overlong and protracted. And last night, after waiting a minute and a half to make a selection, it failed!!! Unbelievable.

There is a complaint number read out in the unnecessarily overlong protracted messaging, but I did not take it down - and I'm certainly not calling again at the cost of over £5 (£4 for the 2 minutes plus £1.60 connection fee) just to retrieve that complaint number!

[Edit: Update - still seething about this. Utter bullshit! I hope someone reading this who is thinking about calling in the future gets a pen handy and jots down the complaints number they quote in their overlong message].

*******

(03-07-2021 12:24 )crankshaft Wrote:  The S66 telephone call-in set-up is beyond a joke. The lead-in messaging is so unnecessarily overlong and protracted. And last night, after waiting a minute and a half to make a selection, it failed!!! Unbelievable.

There is a complaint number read out in the unnecessarily overlong protracted messaging, but I did not take it down - and I'm certainly not calling again at the cost of over £5 (£4 for the 2 minutes plus £1.60 connection fee) just to retrieve that complaint number!

[Edit: Update - still seething about this. Utter bullshit! I hope someone reading this who is thinking about calling in the future gets a pen handy and jots down the complaints number they quote in their overlong message].

The Customer Service number is 0333 321 8894 & is open Mon-Fri 10 til 6. It's on the S66 website + there's an email address too

(04-07-2021 04:36 )bluemoon99 Wrote:  The Customer Service number is 0333 321 8894 & is open Mon-Fri 10 til 6. It's on the S66 website + there's an email address too

thanks

*******